What Categories Determine the Duty a Property Owner Owes?
Indiana law sorts every visitor to a property into one of three categories, and the property owner’s legal duty changes significantly depending on which one applies. Courts classify visitors as invitees, licensees, or trespassers, and Indiana case law, including the frequently cited decision in Burrell v. Meads, has long recognized these distinctions as the foundation of premises liability claims in the state. Under Indiana’s general statute of limitations for personal injury claims, Indiana Code Section 34-11-2-4, a premises liability claim must generally be filed within two years of the injury, regardless of which category of visitor is involved.
What Duty Does a Property Owner Owe an Invitee?
An invitee is someone invited onto a property for the owner’s financial benefit, such as a customer in a store, or someone entering property that is generally open to the public. Property owners owe invitees the highest duty of care under Indiana law, which requires them to actively inspect the property for hazards and either repair known dangers or warn visitors about them. A slip and fall in a grocery store aisle, for example, typically falls under this highest standard of care, and the owner cannot simply claim ignorance of a hazard that reasonable inspection would have caught.
What Duty Does a Property Owner Owe a Licensee?
A licensee has permission to be on a property but is there for their own purposes rather than for the owner’s benefit, such as someone using a business’s restroom without making a purchase. Property owners owe licensees a lesser duty than invitees, generally limited to warning about known dangerous conditions and refraining from willfully or wantonly causing harm. An Indianapolis premises liability lawyer can help determine which category actually applies, since the distinction between an invitee and a licensee is not always obvious from the facts alone, and the outcome of a case can hinge entirely on that classification.
Does a Trespasser Have Any Legal Protection at All?
Trespassers receive the least protection under Indiana law, but property owners are not entirely free of obligations even toward someone on the property without permission. A landowner still cannot willfully or wantonly injure a trespasser once that person’s presence is known, and a different rule may apply if the trespasser is a child drawn onto the property by something enticing, under what is known as the attractive nuisance doctrine. Factors that commonly affect these premises liability disputes include:
- Whether the property owner knew or should have known about the hazard
- How long the dangerous condition existed before the injury occurred
- Whether adequate warning signs or physical barriers were in place
- The purpose and circumstances of the visitor’s presence on the property
The team at Pavlack Law, LLC evaluates these factors carefully, since even a strong claim can unravel if the visitor’s classification is not established clearly from the outset of the case.
How Does Comparative Fault Affect These Claims?
Indiana’s comparative fault rules apply to premises liability claims just as they do to car accidents, meaning a visitor found 51 percent or more at fault for their own injury generally cannot recover any damages at all. An Indianapolis premises liability lawyer can help build a record showing the property owner’s fault clearly, since insurers often argue that a visitor should have noticed and avoided the hazard on their own before it ever caused an injury.
What Should I Do Right After Getting Hurt on Someone’s Property?
Documenting the hazard with photographs, identifying witnesses, and reporting the incident in writing all help preserve evidence that can fade or disappear once a property owner has a chance to repair the condition. Acting quickly after the injury tends to produce a far stronger record than trying to reconstruct events weeks or months later.
If you were hurt on someone else’s property in Indianapolis, speak with our team about the circumstances of your visit and what duty was actually owed to you.
Class action lawsuits for construction contractors who were overcharged by ready mix concrete suppliers due to price-fixing conspiracy.
Settlement for the widow and surviving children of a man who died due to negligence.
Settlement for a woman paralyzed from the waist down in a car collision.
Achieved the state's maximum settlement amount in a medical malpractice case for the widow of man who died due to doctors' negligence.
Settlement on behalf of a business partner who was forced out of his company.
“The team at Pavlack Law, LLC, LLC was professional, loyal, and hardworking from beginning to end. Even when I didn’t know if I had a case, they were extremely helpful and demonstrated their expertise from our first consultation all the way through trial.”
“Eric Pavlack and his associates are a great legal team! Anytime I had questions they were always very helpful and got back to me right away. Throughout the whole process they made sure I was comfortable moving forward with each step. I recommend Pavlack Law, LLC, LLC to anyone looking for legal representation.”
“Attorney Pavlack has represented me and my family for years in various cases including Title Insurance, Wills, General Legal Matters and Social Security. He is always efficient and willing to work around our busy schedules. Highly recommended.”